Current:Home > MarketsLawsuit says Virginia is illegally purging legitimate voters off the rolls -CapitalCourse
Lawsuit says Virginia is illegally purging legitimate voters off the rolls
View
Date:2025-04-17 11:41:56
FALLS CHURCH, Va. (AP) — A coalition of immigrant-rights groups and the League of Women Voters in Virginia has filed a federal lawsuit accusing Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin and Attorney General Jason Miyares of an ongoing “purge” of voter rolls that will disenfranchise legitimate voters.
The lawsuit, filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, argues that an executive order issued in August by Youngkin requiring daily updates to voter lists to remove ineligible voters violates a federal law that requires a 90-day “quiet period” ahead of elections on the maintenance of voter rolls.
The quiet period exists to prevent erroneous removals, the lawsuit states. Virginia’s policy of using data from the Department of Motor Vehicles to determine a voter’s citizenship and eligibility will surely disenfranchise legitimate voters, the lawsuit alleges, because the DMV data is often inaccurate or outdated.
“Defendants’ Purge Program is far from ... a well-designed, well-intended list maintenance effort. It is an illegal, discriminatory, and error-ridden program that has directed the cancelation of voter registrations of naturalized U.S. citizens and jeopardizes the rights of countless others,” the lawsuit states.
Immigrant citizens are at particular risk, the lawsuit states, because individuals can obtain a driver’s license as lawful permanent residents, refugees or asylum applicants, and then later become naturalized citizens. But the data from the Department of Motor Vehicles will still list that individual as a noncitizen.
Christian Martinez, a spokesman for Youngkin, said Virginia is complying with state and federal law.
“Every step in the established list maintenance process is mandated by Virginia law and begins after an individual indicates they are not a citizen. The DMV is mandated by law to send information about individuals who indicate they are a noncitizen in DMV transactions to (the state elections office),” he said. “Anyone spreading misinformation about it is either ignoring Virginia law or is trying to undermine it because they want noncitizens to vote.”
The attorney general’s office did not respond to an email seeking comment.
It’s not clear how many voters have been removed as a result of the executive order. The lawsuit alleges that the Virginia Department of Elections has refused to provide data about its efforts. Youngkin’s executive order states that Virginia removed 6,303 voters from the rolls between January 2022 and July 2023 over citizenship questions.
At the local level, the lawsuit cites anecdotal evidence of county boards removing voters since Youngkin’s executive order was issued and inside the 90-day quiet period required by federal law. In Fairfax County, the state’s most populous jurisdiction, minutes from the August meeting of the electoral board show that 49 voters were removed.
According to the minutes, the elections office received data about 66 voters who were deemed likely noncitizens. The data came from both the state elections office and from an “Election Integrity Task Force” affiliated with the Fairfax County Republican Committee. The county registrar said that the elections office sent notices to all 66, and gave them 14 days to verify their citizenship and eligibility. Of those, 17 responded and were kept on the rolls. The other 49 were removed, and had their names forwarded to the commonwealth’s attorney and the Virginia attorney general’s office for potential prosecution.
The lawsuit says the Fairfax removals, as well as other local actions, show that legitimate voters are being improperly removed if they don’t respond within the 14-day window provided to them.
Orion Danjuma, a lawyer with The Protect Democracy Project, one of the legal groups that filed the lawsuit on the plaintiffs’ behalf, said what’s occurring in Virginia is part of a national effort by supporters of former President Donald Trump to sow doubts about election integrity and delegitimize the results if Trump loses in November.
“The allies of the former president are advancing a narrative that’s false,” he said. “And they’re putting the voting rights of every citizen on the line to do it.”
The lawsuit asks a judge to bar the state from removing voters under what it describes as the state’s “purge program,” and restoration to the voter rolls of those who have been removed as a result of it.
A hearing on the request has not yet been scheduled.
veryGood! (14)
Related
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- A crane has collapsed at a China bridge construction project, killing 6 people
- As climate risks increase, New York could require flood disclosures in home sales
- Ex-CIA employee snared earlier in classified info bust found guilty of possessing child abuse images
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Judge severs Trump's Georgia case, and 16 others, from trial starting in October
- Niger’s junta released a French official held for 5 days
- Florida health officials warn against new COVID booster, contradicting CDC guidance
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Wisconsin settles state Justice Department pollution allegations against 2 factory farms
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- iPhone 12 sales banned in France over radiation level. Why Apple users shouldn’t freak out.
- Bryan Kohberger, suspect in murders of 4 Idaho college students, wants cameras banned from the courtroom
- A second major British police force suffers a cyberattack in less than a month
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- DeSantis says he does not support criminalizing women who get abortions
- *NSYNC's Reunion Continues With New Song Better Place—Listen Now
- Former suburban Detroit prosecutor gets no additional jail time in sentence on corruption charges
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Man is accused of holding girlfriend captive in university dorm for days
Russia expels 2 US diplomats, accusing them of ‘illegal activity’
Louis C.K. got canceled, then uncanceled. Too soon? New 'Sorry/Not Sorry' doc investigates
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Scotland player out of Rugby World Cup after slipping on stairs. Not the sport’s first weird injury
Chevron reports LNG outage at Australian plant as strike action escalates
iPhone 15: 4 things the new iPhone can do that your old one can't